This article provides an overview of GPG Professional Practice 3 (PP3) – Analysis, which is the professional practice that “reviews and assesses an organization in terms of what its objectives are, how it functions, and the constraints of the environment in which it operates”.
PP3 introduces and addresses the business impact analysis (BIA) as a primary means of analysis, leading to appropriate business continuity requirements. PP3 identifies the following beneficial outcomes from the BIA: Continue reading
September marks the beginning of National Preparedness Month (NPM) sponsored by FEMA’s Ready Campaign.
The 2015 theme is: “Don’t Wait. Communicate. Make Your Emergency Plan Today.”
The goal of National Preparedness Month is to encourage individuals, businesses, and communities to plan and prepare in advance so they can safely respond and communicate in the event of a disaster. Continue reading
WHAT IS ISO 22317?
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Technical Committee (TC) 292, the committee responsible for writing security, resilience, and business continuity standards, has released its latest document: ISO 22317 – Societal Security – Business Continuity Management Systems – Business Impact Analysis, the first and only international standard solely addressing the business impact analysis (BIA).
ISO 22317 was officially published on September 17, 2015.
There are a few important points to understand before reading ISO 22317: Continue reading
This article reviews GPG Professional Practice 2 (PP2): Embedding Business Continuity and explains why embedding business continuity into your organization is important for driving success, describes best practices for embedding business continuity into day-to-day activities, and provides a brief case study highlighting the benefits of this practice.
PP2 outlines a number of techniques on how to embed business continuity into the organization. Specifically, the BCI separates PP2 into the following topics: Continue reading
Team leaders play a critical role in improving business continuity for their organizations but seldom receive the appropriate training to help them understand the differences between day-to-day leadership and crisis leadership following the onset of a disruptive incident.
This perspective is the second in a three-part series that addresses how to develop the skills necessary for being a successful leader in a crisis, including how a team leader can set the team’s purpose and bring order to the chaos that ensues following the onset of a disruption. These two foundational team leader behaviors will help elicit the best possible performance of the team (as well as themselves). Continue reading
SETTING THE STAGE
This morning was a non-eventful morning. I was sitting in my office, sipping on my coffee, and working on my monthly reports. Then, the manager of our office building entered our lobby.
The Michael Brelo case is nearing an end. Closing arguments have been heard and a verdict is expected shortly. The question is, when?
Our building manager was concerned, and rightfully so.
Our office is located directly across the street from the justice center where the case is taking place. Just a couple weeks ago, we sat witness to the riots and devastation in Baltimore, and, from our ongoing monitoring of the situation and media this week, our team is aware that the City of Cleveland is actively bracing for the possible impact and chaos that could result when the verdict is announced. Continue reading
This article provides an overview of GPG Professional Practice 1 (PP1) – Policy and Program Management, the first of the six professional practices, and discusses the importance and recommendations in establishing the foundation for a repeatable and scalable business continuity program.
PP1 outlines a number of activities that organizations should consider completing before performing business continuity planning activities (business impact analysis through exercising): Continue reading
The Business Continuity Institute (BCI) publishes the Good Practice Guidelines (GPGs), which is a compilation of six professional practices that provide guidance to business continuity practitioners on implementing and maintaining a business continuity program. While the BCI GPGs generally align with ISO 22301, which provides high-level guidance on establishing a business continuity management system, the Practices actually enhance ISO 22301 by answering the “why” and “how” of establishing a program. Continue reading
How to Perform an Effective Business Continuity Strategy Identification and Selection Effort
Reader Note: This article is a continuation from Avalution’s November 2014 article titled: We just did a BIA and Risk Assessment … Now What? How to Perform an Effective Business Continuity Gap Analysis. If your organization just finished a business impact analysis (BIA) and risk assessment, but has not yet performed a gap analysis, it may be helpful to read about performing an effective gap analysis before continuing on to this article.
Once an organization understands gaps between business continuity requirements (as defined in the business impact and risk assessment) and current capabilities, management can determine which gaps they wish to address through strategy selection – either through risk mitigation or resource-specific recovery methods. Determining methods to decrease the likelihood of a disruptive incident reduces the potential that a risk will materialize, while identifying methods to respond to and recover from a disruptive incident decreases downtime and protects the organizations’ brand and financial position (among other assets). Continue reading
Faults & Fixes: Bad Training
As business continuity professionals, we tend to gravitate to the activities where we think we can deliver the most value. This often takes the form of the business impact analysis, helping management come up with strategies that minimize risk, and documenting these strategies into plans. Ensuring that a business continuity program employs effective training approaches and engages business process owners, unfortunately, often plays “second fiddle” to other activities. One only needs to browse any of the top business continuity and disaster recovery related publications to see this disparity. Searching for “business impact analysis” or “business continuity plan” yields substantially more results than “business continuity training.” Yet without effective training, all that hard work will likely either fail or not perform to desired standards during a real disruptive incident. Continue reading